On controlling women

It is incredibly inspirational to know that all of the world’s major religious traditions have always recognized the fundamental distinction between genders as being marked by the internal dialectic of male patriarchal dominance and complete female subordination and debasement. Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Christianity have all understood all women as being essentially sick, twisted, evil creatures in need of superior masculine guidance.

One text I would love to recommend to all of my male readers is the so-called Laws of Manu or the Manu Smriti (in Sanskrit), one of the oldest Hindu religious and legal texts amongst a collection of works known as the Dharmasastra, the composition of which dates from around 200 BC. Regardless of whatever one’s opinions on religion are, I firmly believe that even the most atheistic and materialistic of men can still profit enormously from the great wisdom and insight offered into the character of women and the nature of femininity provided by the Laws of Manu. It is a very spiritually uplifting work and can provide a tremendous amount of encouragement and inspiration for all those men seeking to keep their wives and mistresses under the control of an iron fist. Some of the great and timeless pearls of wisdom contained within the Laws of Manu include,

It is the nature of women to seduce men in this world; for that reason the wise are never left unguarded in the company of females. For women are able to lead astray in this world not only a fool, but even a learned man, and to make him a slave of anger and desire. (Manu, 2: 213-214)

By a girl, by a young woman, or even by an aged one, nothing must be done independently, even in her own house. (Manu, 5: 147)

Though destitute of virtue, or seeking pleasure elsewhere, or devoid of good qualities, yet a husband must be constantly worshipped as a god by a faithful wife. (Manu, 5: 154)

The rightly celebrated, yet controversial, ninth section of the Laws of Manu contains a vivid portrait of how thoroughly perverse and satanic all women are. One can readily see from the opening paragraphs of section IX itself that the knowledge that “all women are whores” is many thousands of years old.

It was once famously quipped upon the discovery and publication of the Laws of Manu by the Indologist Sir William Jones in 1794, that the British Raj thereafter almost universally neglected the education of women throughout their colonial occupation of India. It was widely known that the strong legal prohibitions against women reading or even touching the sacred Vedic literature in the Laws of Manu were widely interpreted by the English colonizers as justifying the total subjugation of women through denying them any access to education, not just in India but everywhere. It also revealed that male dominance and female inferiority has been sanctioned by Hinduism as the supreme law of India for untold millenia.

Thus, I think that the Laws of Manu should be essential reading for all virile men regardless of religious or even spiritual conviction. No philosophically inclined chauvinist should lead his life in abysmal ignorance of it. Let no man who wishes to dominate and fully control his wife or mistress be without knowledge of its contents. It is one of the many ancient works revealing how cold, selfish and incredibly mentally limited all women are in a most didactic, picturesque way. Even Friedrich Nietzsche, that immortal prophet of a will to power the natural consequence of which is pure, unadulterated masculinity, declared that the New Testament pales in comparison to the Laws of Manu. He saw all other ethical codes as simply imitations or gross caricatures of it. Nietzsche saw the Laws of Manu as being a salubrious breath of fresh air amidst the frozen wastes of Christian “slave morality.”

In praise of Islam

I certainly understand the great disgust that most men harbour against the Islamic religion. The very theological underpinnings of Muslim fundamentalism may seem irrational, if not downright incoherent. Osama bin Laden and company may be the most comical of demagogues since Charlie Chaplin last goose-stepped on camera. However, the strict Wahhabi puritanism of most Islamist terrorists and salafi jihadists, the images of which are commonly plastered throughout the media, are actually rather quite marginal to the overall aims of the Islamic religion as a whole.There seem to be numerous misconceptions about Islam itself. I have little interest in evangelizing anybody in the central tenets of Islamist theology. After all, I am no missionary, but an apostle of male patriarchal dominance in its purest form. However, the very social structure legitimated by the religion of Islam is certainly praiseworthy and very much in harmony with the ideals of the truest and most virile masculinity.

Those people who are fully assimilated to the values as well as ideological superstructure of modern Western European civilization can actually learn a thing or two about manliness and manhood from Muslim culture.In fact, the United States on September 11, 2001, as well as other western societies like Great Britain and Spain, were successfully attacked by teams of well-organized radical Islamic fundamentalists because of the fact that all western societies have been undergoing a period of rapid feminization since the dawn of the Sexual Revolution in the sixties. The Sexual Revolution was the foolish male attempt to liberate themselves from the tyranny of female domesticity and matriarchal asexuality through the invention of effective synthetic progesterone-based oral contraceptives. Ultimately, it seems that the invention of the pill itself, which relieved so many women from the burdern of pregnancy by making the timing of pregnancy the outcome purely of female choice, triggered the catastrophic de-masculinization of western society that has made the current global social and political order almost tottering on the brink of collapse.

Actually, the contemporary scene within the Occident on an international level can no longer be seen as consisting of the great western democracies. Rather, we are living in an age which is politically dominated by female-controlled western cliterocracies or gynecocracies. Thus, on the eve of September 11, the United States, in the grips of a dangerous matriarchal obsession with (embarassingly enough) women in all levels of the central bureaucracy itself, was attacked. It was attacked because the people of the United States were too busy feminizing all apects of the Western European culture within it. Maybe if the androgenization of both genders, the chief ideological goal of any doctrinaire feminism, wasn’t so touted by the male feminist-dominated United States legislature, the World Trade Centre would never have been attacked.Now, my brothers, let’s look at how Islam deals with women. I know the religious doctrines may sound a tad objectionable to our rationalistic male sensibilities. However, let us ignore the religious dogmas for a minute and let’s focus on religious practice.For one thing, in Islam, the woman belongs in the kitchen and is legislated at gunpoint to stay in the kitchen. I find this an excellent solution to the problem of pay equity and sexual harassment in the workplace.

Islam also teaches us that having women in the workplace is a crime against nature; those who permit women to participate in the workforce should be beaten severely, even executed by the government. In addition, Islam is its strict segregation of the sexes, known as purdah. Islam fully recognizes the obvious intellectual and biological inferiority of women and mandates that they should have no right to associate with any man in public, barring blood relatives. Islam also demands that all women be veiled from head to foot when they go out in public. This makes it exceedingly difficult for any woman to use the natural weapons of her sex, namely the use of her body to financially exploit male sexual vulnerability. Another example of the excellence of religion of the prophet is that no woman can testify against any man in court. A husband’s right to administer corporal punishment to his wife is legally enshrined within the constitution of the Islamic Caliphate itself.Women are also not allowed to vote or participate in public office as well. Another highly praiseworthy aspect of Muslim culture is its legal recognition that women are essentially pieces of chattel property that should be bought and sold. It also alleviates the marriage problem by allowing any man to purchase a wife as a commodity that can be disposed of at any time. In Islam, only men have the right to divorce. Women are not even allowed to have access to any kind of education whatsoever.

In the Muslim religion, men are men and women are women. All women must obey all men and any woman who refuses to submit to male dominance will be promptly handed over to the police and imprisoned.Islam, when it comes to the treatment of women, is a paradise for men.So, my brothers, I don’t think we should be so quick to dismiss the religion of Islam. Yes, I admit Osama is a bit laughable, but the Prophet Mohammed was really onto something when he allowed polygamous marriages in which women are treated as property.

I think that Islam has many virtues, especially in its celebration of unbridled masculinity and naked male patriarchal dominance. We could actually learn a thing or two from the Koran, especially in regards to how we should better control our women who, dressed in stiletto heels and tight boob shirts, are out wrecking the veryfoundations of western civilization itself. No wonder the west is in a state of rapid decline and Muslim culture is in the ascendancy. We’ve given women the reins of power for so long.

Come on, men, let’s pull up our trousers and force all women back into the kitchen where they belong, even at gunpoint, if necessary. We have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

A few thoughts on the legitimacy of rape...

From an evolutionary biological perspective, rape is primarily an act of sexual gratification achieved by means of circumventing female reproductive choice. Rape can also be interpreted as a justified political act of revolutionary upheaval; it is a vehicle by which mass terror is readily disseminated throughout any given female population demographic. In the hands of any trained urban guerrilla commando, it can be one of the most effective tactics of psychological warfare at one’s disposal. On the basis of military strategy alone, the act of forcible copulation itself can function as a form of personal empowerment that can only be asserted in the face of any female-dominated liberal establishment. Often, the only way to destroy any matriarchal tyranny, which happens to be ideologically sustained by the prevailing social liberalism within current political discourse, is through the sublime mechanism of rape.

Rape is the supreme act of revenge against the power of the dominant Alpha male. To take a woman, the property of the dominant male who secured her, and use her for the sole purpose of sexual release is a supremely heroic act. It is the logical extension of the central physiological aim of the male reproductive strategy; it is based on the fierce competition for available females as a scarce commodity that pits rutting animals against one another in an attempt to secure a viable means by which the transmission of their own genes is assured. To rape a woman is the ultimate act of male sexual superiority. Through raping another man’s woman, one not only denigrates the woman who is being raped, but one also diminishes whatever status or influence has already accrued to the dominant male whose sexual partner is the one being violated in the first place.