Male intellectual superiority can be easily explained on the basis of a neuro-physiological examination of gender-based differences in relative brain size and z-value conversion of male-female IQ scores.
Scientists have known for hundreds of years that adults have a much larger cranial capacity than children because of higher levels of developmental intelligence; human beings have greater relative brain size than the higher primates due to the effects of biological evolution; and males have heavier brains than females because men have greater mental capacity than women.
Consistent with the latest craniometric analyses, men have an average brain mass of 1,077 g; women have one of 949 g. Men also have 4 billion or 16% more neocortical neurons than women, meaning that the male brain is much more highly specialized in the processing and transmission of information. Ultimately, it is this neuro-anatomical fact which underlies the pervasive biological reality that between genders, relative brain size determines level of general intelligence.
The researchers Andreasen et al (1993) conducted a meticulous investigation into the well-known causal relationship between brain volume and mental ability. They discovered that men and women of more gifted intelligence than their same gender peers, as evaluated by the WAIS-R (a powerful analytical tool devised in accord with conventional psychometric methodology), also had correspondingly heavier brains, larger intracranial capacity, more complex external convolutions on the brain surface and larger frontal lobes. It also determined that the men, having the larger cranial capacity per cubic centimetre, performed at considerably higher levels of competence on IQ tests than women.
As indicated by z-score conversion of bell curve values generated by IQ scores for men and women (based on figures derived from the psychometric analysis of Stumpf and Jackson, 1994), there is a 65% probability that the average man is considerably more intelligent than the average female; whereas, there is a 35% probability that the average woman is more intelligent than the average man. Another way of expressing this is that 65 out of a hundred men will demonstrate a much greater mental capacity than the average female; 35 out of 100 women will actually exceed the average male score for mean intelligence. Thus, it follows that if there are almost twice as many men as there are women who exceed the mean intelligence for both genders then it follows logically that the average man is much more intelligent than the average female.
In the final analysis, women have lower levels of intelligence and creativity than men. This is probably due to the fact that women have brains that resemble a gorillas’ in both size and overall neurological functioning; amongst human beings, the female possesses a brain the furthest removed from that of modern, civilized man. On this basis then, the average man has considerable rational justification for assuming that most women are dumber than fuck.
Is not this gender assymetry in brain size made more obvious still through the daily interactions of the sexes? In reality, the overwhelming majority of women are just as dumb as the vapid blonde bimbo of locker room folklore.
"La Garde meurt mais ne se rend pas. Vive l'Empereur Napoléon, vive la France!"
- Monsieur Nicholas Chauvin
This blog was written in defence of male superiority and patriarchal dominance; it was written with the idea in mind that all women are breeders and homemakers who belong in the kitchen. The blog itself was initially conceived of as being a great counter-offensive against the twin evils of both feminism and liberal socialism.